World Sailing
☰   World Sailing
THE IJSC EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM
Logged off
[ ACCEPT × ]

The information contained within this report may be shared with any appropriate member of World Sailing committees or staff for the purpose of evaluating your report.
Please note that all personal data provided will be processed in accordance with World Sailings Privacy Notice. Full details can be found here.
If you have any queries completing any stages of your application, please contact raceofficials@sailing.org

 

× [ CLOSE × ]

×

Privacy Policy
×

 
THIS SECTION MAY BE COMPLETED BY ANY JURY MEMBER
Comments on rule questions, new interpretations, problems, unpopular Rule 62 (Redress) decisions, summary of the facts, conclusions and decisions of Rule 69 (Allegations of Gross Misconduct) actions, problems with Sailing Instructions or Notice of Race and experience with experimental procedures.
The SI provided for discretionary penalties for a breach of the sign out and sign in procedure. On the first racing day there were 8 protests for not signing out and or signing in, all of which needed individual hearings. The SI was then changed to allow for a standard penalty imposed by the RC.
With 3 big classes and 2 race courses, challenging conditions in a bay and alternating racing areas for the classes each day, the sailors really got to prove their skills over the championships.
2 clubs were co-hosting the event and this lead to some interesting logistical challenges, that were resolved in a satisfactory way. Both clubs were very welcoming, friendly and professional.
The jury boats initially given were not suitable for the event and the OA really made an effort to find better boats. Some boats were replaced, but unfortunately they could not find replacements for all.
With 7 fleets and 5 (some too small) jury boats, rule 42 coverage of the fleets was less than ideal but as good as it could be.
RC and jury worked well together in the best interest of the event.
With the class measurer and the class representative on the jury, it was at times impossible to set up 2 full panels for hearings and rule N1.4 was applied at occasions when the jury had then fewer than 10 members.
Ner of classes: 3
Entries: 329
Ner of Countries represented: 41
Ner of Races sailed: 36
Ner of requests for redress: 7
Ner of requests for redress for OCS: 0
Ner of requests for OCS granted: 0
Total number of hearings: 31
Total number of arbitrations: 0
Number of % penalties: 45
To be completed only if Appendix P was applied.
Number of First Penalties (Appendix P2.1): 50
Number of Second Penalties (Appendix P2.2): 9
Number of Third Penalties (Appendix P2.3): 0
P2.3 Subsequent Penalties: 0
Event:
Laser European and World Championships 2013
Date Event Started
30 August 2013
Event Location:
Dublin Bay, IRL
Group Event belongs:
A - Ireland, UK
Jury Chairman's name:
Marianne Middelthon
Jury chairman's email:
marianneom@mac.com
Judge submitting report:
Marianne Middelthon
Email of judge submitting report:
marianneom@mac.com
PRO at event :
Con Murphy & Jack Roy
PRO sailorID and status:
IRLCM44, I ( IRO )
Email of PRO:
Con Murphy , Jack Roy
Was this an International Jury Panel ?
Yes
 
Please name each judge (including the chairman) and their country and IJ or NJ certification. one per line
Marianne Middelthon, NOR, IJ NORMM1
Ron Hutchieson, IRL, IJ IRLRH12
Ronnie R. McCracken, HKG, IJHKGRM1
Mladen Makjanic, CRO, IJ CROMM18
Boguslaw Moczorodynski, POL, IJ POLBM3
Pauline Wilmink, NED, IJ NEDPW5
Barbara Murray, ESP, IJ ESPBM1
Ed Alcock, IRL, NJ IRLEA1
Arto Kiiski, FIN, NJ FINAK7
Eileen Loo, SIN, NJ Marianne Middelthon, NOR, IJ NORMM1
Ron Hutchieson, IRL, IJ IRLRH12
Ronnie R. McCracken, HKG, IJHKGRM1
Mladen Makjanic, CRO, IJ CROMM18
Boguslaw Moczorodynski, POL, IJ POLBM3
Pauline Wilmink, NED, IJ NEDPW5
Barbara Murray, ESP, IJ ESPBM1
Ed Alcock, IRL, NJ IRLEA1
Arto Kiiski, FIN, NJ FINAK7
Eileen Loo, SIN, NJ