World Sailing
THE IJSC EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM
Logged off
[ ACCEPT × ]

The information contained within this report may be shared with any appropriate member of World Sailing committees or staff for the purpose of evaluating your report.
Please note that all personal data provided will be processed in accordance with World Sailings Privacy Notice. Full details can be found here.
If you have any queries completing any stages of your application, please contact raceofficials@sailing.org

 

× [ CLOSE × ]

×

 
THIS SECTION MAY BE COMPLETED BY ANY JURY MEMBER
Comments on rule questions, new interpretations, problems, unpopular Rule 62 (Redress) decisions, summary of the facts, conclusions and decisions of Rule 69 (Allegations of Gross Misconduct) actions, problems with Sailing Instructions or Notice of Race and experience with experimental procedures.
The SIs made the jury the approval authority for substitutions for damagaed or lost equipment. This should have been the RC, of whom the measuerer was part. It proved awkward in one case where a competitor requested redress over a refusal of a request, so that the jury was considering redress of a jury decision. A recommendation will be made to the class to have this authority in the Race Committee in future events.
Discretionary penalties were applied in a Race Committee protest against competitors who failed to check in. The penalties were based on the Olympic Regatta guidelines, with penalties reduced by a band level.
The event was sailed off a beach and 3 of the 5 days of racing were lost due to high winds - the winds were not problematic per se, but generated heavy surf that made launch and recovery hazardous. Nearly 20 percent of the fleet suffered damage while launching or recovering on day 2. The Race committee wisely took this into account when postponing ashore on subsequent days.
Ner of classes: 1
Entries: 74
Ner of Countries represented: 7
Ner of Races sailed: 5
Ner of requests for redress: 6
Ner of requests for redress for OCS: 1
Ner of requests for OCS granted: 0
Total number of hearings: 8
Total number of arbitrations: 0
Number of % penalties: 0
To be completed only if Appendix P was applied.
Number of First Penalties (Appendix P2.1): 2
Number of Second Penalties (Appendix P2.2): 0
Number of Third Penalties (Appendix P2.3): 0
P2.3 Subsequent Penalties: 0
Event:
2013 Sunfish World Championships
Date Event Started
5 October 2013
Event Location:
Lewes DE, USA
Group Event belongs:
P - North America
Jury Chairman's name:
Warren Nethercote
Jury chairman's email:
wnethercote@eastlink.ca
Judge submitting report:
Warren Nethercote
Email of judge submitting report:
wnethercote@eastlink.ca
PRO at event :
Taran Teague
PRO sailorID and status:
Email of PRO:
jtteague@aol.com
Was this an International Jury Panel ?
Yes
 
Please name each judge (including the chairman) and their country and IJ or NJ certification. one per line
Warren Nethercote, CAN IJ CANWN2
Joe Krolak, USA IJ USAJK24
Jorge Barreda, PER IJ PERJB1
Rafael Zarazua, MEX NJ
Steve Shepstone, USA NJ
Warren Nethercote, CAN IJ CANWN2
Joe Krolak, USA IJ USAJK24
Jorge Barreda, PER IJ PERJB1
Rafael Zarazua, MEX NJ
Steve Shepstone, USA NJ