THIS SECTION MAY BE COMPLETED BY ANY JURY MEMBER
Comments on rule questions, new interpretations, problems, unpopular Rule 62 (Redress) decisions, summary of the facts, conclusions and decisions of Rule 69 (Allegations of Gross Misconduct) actions, problems with Sailing Instructions or Notice of Race and experience with experimental procedures.
No unusual incidents.
Exceptionally well organised International Regatta.
Numbers were down on last year and that reflects on economy and reluctance of some to travel.
Fabulous wind for first four days, light on last day
The relationship between Organisers, International Jury, Race Director Simon James and PRO Ross Chisholm was of the highest order.
Ner of classes: 3
Entries: 16
Ner of Countries represented: 7
Ner of Races sailed: 27
Ner of requests for redress: 0
Ner of requests for redress for OCS: 0
Ner of requests for OCS granted: 0
Total number of hearings: 2
Total number of arbitrations: 0
Number of % penalties: 0
To be completed only if Appendix P was applied.
Number of First Penalties (Appendix P2.1): 0
Number of Second Penalties (Appendix P2.2): 0
Number of Third Penalties (Appendix P2.3): 0
P2.3 Subsequent Penalties: 0
Event:
Samui Regatta 2015
Date Event Started
24 May 2015
Event Location:
Ko Samui Thailand, ALG
Group Event belongs:
K - South & Central Asia
Jury Chairman's name:
Mark Pryke
Jury chairman's email:
mark.pryke@gmail.com
Judge submitting report:
Mark Pryke
Email of judge submitting report:
mark.pryke@gmail.com
PRO at event :
Ross Chisholm
PRO sailorID and status:
( IRO )
Email of PRO:
Was this an International Jury Panel ?
Yes
Please name each judge (including the chairman) and their country and IJ or NJ certification. one per line
Mark Pryke AUS IJ,IRO
Hong Kit Lock SIN, IJ,IRO
Tom Shepard HKG IJ
David Brookes AUS IRO, NJ
Kim Thomas THA NJ
Mark Pryke AUS IJ,IRO
Hong Kit Lock SIN, IJ,IRO
Tom Shepard HKG IJ
David Brookes AUS IRO, NJ
Kim Thomas THA NJ
The information contained within this report may be shared with any appropriate member of World Sailing committees or staff for the purpose of evaluating your report.