World Sailing
THE IJSC EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM
Logged off
[ ACCEPT × ]

The information contained within this report may be shared with any appropriate member of World Sailing committees or staff for the purpose of evaluating your report.
Please note that all personal data provided will be processed in accordance with World Sailings Privacy Notice. Full details can be found here.
If you have any queries completing any stages of your application, please contact raceofficials@sailing.org

 

× [ CLOSE × ]

×

 
THIS SECTION MAY BE COMPLETED BY ANY JURY MEMBER
Comments on rule questions, new interpretations, problems, unpopular Rule 62 (Redress) decisions, summary of the facts, conclusions and decisions of Rule 69 (Allegations of Gross Misconduct) actions, problems with Sailing Instructions or Notice of Race and experience with experimental procedures.
Jury acted under N1.5 as one IJ was not able to come due to ill health. At the beginning of the event there was a major measurement issue with the length of the boom of many boats being too short to comply with the class rules. In the view of some parties, the class rule does not allow for competitors to change their equipment from how it is supplied, but the sole supplier had delivered many booms not conforming to the class rule. Shorter booms have benefits during manoeuvres in this class. After some discussion between international class, measurer and jury, a solution was found which allowed the competitors to modify the length of the boom within the strict one-design rules. Appendix T was applied and most boat/boat protests were solved in arbitration. The SI prescribed two notice boards and two jury desks at different clubs, which made receiving and posting protests in time challenging at times. Slack was used for jury communications and helped communicating between the two jury desks. For arbitration hearings the jury decided after a discussion that in case a member of the jury was witness to the incident, this judge would do the arbitration. - GERPS1
Ner of classes: 1
Entries: 59
Ner of Countries represented: 8
Ner of Races sailed: 12
Ner of requests for redress: 2
Ner of requests for redress for OCS: 2
Ner of requests for OCS granted: 0
Total number of hearings: 3
Total number of arbitrations: 9
Number of % penalties: 30
To be completed only if Appendix P was applied.
Number of First Penalties (Appendix P2.1): 1
Number of Second Penalties (Appendix P2.2): 0
Number of Third Penalties (Appendix P2.3): 0
P2.3 Subsequent Penalties: 0
Event:
2018 SB20 World Championship
Date Event Started
7 January 2018
Event Location:
DSS RYCT, Hobart, Tasmania, AUS
Group Event belongs:
L - SW Pacific
Jury Chairman's name:
Peter Scheuerl
Jury chairman's email:
peter@scheuerl.net
Judge submitting report:
Peter Scheuerl
Email of judge submitting report:
peter@scheuerl.net
PRO at event :
Nicholas Hutton
PRO sailorID and status:
AUSNH9 ( IRO )
Email of PRO:
sailing@ryct.org.au
Was this an International Jury Panel ?
Yes
 
Please name each judge (including the chairman) and their country and IJ or NJ certification. one per line
Luke Tupper AUSLTUNK13 / NJ
Peter Scheuerl GERPS1 / IJ
Rees Jonathon AUSJR34 / NJ
Tracy Heritage AUSTH13 / NJ
Michael Alison NZLMA3 / IJ
Luke Tupper AUSLTUNK13 / NJ
Peter Scheuerl GERPS1 / IJ
Rees Jonathon AUSJR34 / NJ
Tracy Heritage AUSTH13 / NJ
Michael Alison NZLMA3 / IJ